Objective 1: Discuss and know the meaning of 'Performance Anxiety' after reading the various definitions of performance anxiety.
What is 'Performance Anxiety'?

Performance anxiety is sometimes called stage fright. It is a fear of performing in public. It is a term used to refer to self-consciousness and anxiousness about the quality of one's performance. (=a self-conscious and self-doubting awareness that hinders performance instead of helping)
Various definitions about Performance Anxiety
|
There are three qualities that a
successful performer must have: a) a technical control of their
instrument, b) good taste in using this technique musically and
artistically and c) the courage to do this in front of an audience.
There are few activities that can produce tension and anxiety as
quickly and as thoroughly as performing in public.
Most performers have experienced
performance anxiety in some form and to various degrees. This fear
may be experienced while preparing for a performance, for days or
even weeks before hand, and not just while performing. It can be
experienced in the present (stage fright) as apprehension (fear of
what could happen) and arousal (anticipation). Performance anxiety
is no different from general anxiety. Feelings of fear and
apprehension are accompanied by increased and prolonged
physiological arousal. Severe anxiety is where the arousal is too
high for optimal performance. This arousal may be normal and
temporary, or abnormal and long lasting and symptoms can be
cognitive, behavioral and physiological. Research (Steptoe 1989)
shows that the processes underlying musical performance anxiety
indicate that cognitive, behavioral and physiological factors are
involved.
Physiological reactions to stress
and anxiety include difficulty concentrating, loss of appetite,
increased heart rate, and shortness of breath, dizziness,
butterflies, shaking knees, shaking hands and sweaty palms.
Generally the physiological symptoms are part of the fight or flight
reflex. Measurements taken during studies of performance anxiety
also showed raised levels of adrenaline and noradrenalin in the
urine and this causes the hyper-alertness mentioned previously. This
indicates activation of the nervous system (Deutsch 1999) and these
physiological reactions interfere with performing by making it
difficult to control finger actions and breathing.
Cognitive symptoms of anxiety
include fear of making mistakes and feelings of inadequacy and
worrying about things happening. Behavioral symptoms are not being
able to do things, which normally happen naturally.
The three components of
performance anxiety (physiological, cognitive and behavioral as
mentioned previously) are the same as in general anxiety and are not
always co-related (Lehrer in Grindea 1995). Sometimes the symptoms
of performance anxiety come from one group and at other times all
three. Interestingly, performance anxiety seems to affect more
females than males (Deutsch 1999). Abel et al (1990) puts this down
to the theory that males are less able to express their feelings
than females.
Levels of performance anxiety
vary considerably between musicians, as do the effects that anxiety
has on their performances. Age seems to be significant in the matter
of performance anxiety suggesting that as they get older,
professional musicians are more able to cope with stress (Clarke et
al. 2000). The development of strategies for coping may increase
with age and experience. Inability to communicate is usually not due
to lack of desire or lack of ability or talent but is usually the
result of physical tension, flawed mental attitudes and social
pressures. The one thing that is not clear is whether physical
tensions cause the flawed mental attitudes or do flawed mental
attitudes cause the physical tensions? Further research may shed
light on this.
The transactional model of stress
suggests that anxiety occurs when an individual believes that they
do not have the ability to handle the demands of a situation
(Reactive anxiety). Studies have indicated that high levels of
anxiety are related to low levels of confidence (Abel et al 1990).
Mastery of task and anxiety are related. Research has found that if
the task is simple or well learned so that the correct responses are
dominant, then an audience enhances task performances (Zajonc as
cited in Lloyd & Mayes 1999). If the task is poorly learned such
that incorrect responses are likely to be dominant, then an audience
inhibits task performance. Therefore the general effect of an
audience is to enhance the likelihood of dominant responses. The
argument therefore is that the presence of others increases drive
and thereby enhances the performance of well-learned tasks and
inhibits the performance of poorly learned tasks.
Picard (1999) states that
literature on Performance Anxiety is contradictory. Some research
stresses Performance Anxiety's detrimental effects while others deal
with the positive effects but most research so far on the causes of
anxiety, has focused on brain processes and psychological factors
such as cognitive processes and learning processes. From the
earliest work on anxiety, researchers have consistently reported a
negative correlation between high levels of anxiety and achievement.
The effects of anxiety on achievement are quite clear. Anxiety can
be both the cause and effect of failure. Performers play badly
because they are anxious and their poor performance increases their
anxiety.
But it is suggested that some
anxiety is good for us as performers (Adaptive anxiety). It may
actually help us to perform better in some situations (Hallam 1998),
and while anxiety can be negative, musicians tend to respond to
anxiety rather than be affected by it - indeed many performers argue
that they need to be aroused in order to perform well (Steptoe 1989)
and the Yerkes-Dodson law (Eysenck 1998) states that performance is
enhanced with mild levels of anxiety.
However performance begins to
suffer if the anxiety becomes too great (Maladaptive anxiety).
Experience of traumatic events producing anxiety has a long history
in psychology. One bad experience of performing leads to another.
The experience becomes internalized through a process of
conditioning and so the fear is reproduced in later situations.
Anxiety becomes a response to something that may happen and not a
response to something that does happen. This is the Catastrophe
Theory and it was originally a mathematical model (Hardy & Parfitt
1991). The 'vicious circle' becomes possible where the perception of
mistakes leads to the increase of anxiety, leading to more mistakes
until the performance collapses. Anxiety and stress may also affect
the self-reflective capacity that we as human beings have (Gross
1995). This in turn may influence self-esteem and faith in one's
ability, which may also increase the anxiety, felt, and increases
the likelihood of pathological anxiety developing.
So, why is anxiety so common -
particularly since it is an unpleasant experience? Like most
psychological disorders, general anxiety tends to run in families.
Torgerson (as cited in Eysenck 1998) found that anxiety states were
around twice as common in close relatives. His evidence from twin
studies suggested that there might be a genetic basis to general
anxiety but it did not appear to be a strong influence. Kemp (1996)
claims that performance anxiety is most likely to affect those who
have a tendency to neuroticism and that musicians have more anxious,
neurotic personalities than most of the general population. It is
difficult though, to assess whether this is because a nervous
disposition helps you become a musician or if musical performance
leads to anxiety. So is anxiety a personality trait shared by those
who become musicians or is there something about performing that
leads to pathological anxiety? In other words is anxiety a 'trait'
(due to personality) or is it a 'state' (due to the particular
circumstance)?
This is a difficult question to
answer. Steptoe, A. & Fidler, H. (1987) found that there was a
direct correlation between performance anxiety and neuroticism (a
personality 'trait') leading us to believe that there may be a
connection between personality and performance anxiety. Eysenck
(Robinson 2000) also proposed that personality was made up of many
traits and that these traits give rise to tendencies to behave in
particular ways, including being anxious. In addition, Kemp (1996)
thinks that it is important to make a distinction between 'trait'
anxiety, (your tendency to be anxious) and 'state' anxiety (Which is
when a person's anxiety levels are affected by a situation.).
However in reality the difference between 'state' and 'trait' is not
as clear-cut. A person's tendency to anxiety will influence the
level of response they give to a situation but in fact, the
situation may be stressful and the performer will react to it and
not their innate tendency to be anxious. Some performers are anxious
in many situations while some situations are especially anxiety
provoking. (State anxiety) Skinner's belief (Robinson 2000) was that
our environment determined our behavior and we should also be aware
that the mere physical presence of some people could have an
influence on thoughts, feelings and actions whether or not the
person is involved with the performer as another group member.
Many researchers (e.g. Hamann &
Sobaje 1983) believe that far from being a negative influence,
'State' anxiety (When a person's anxiety levels are affected by a
situation) has motivational and drive properties that are of benefit
to performance. Kemp (1996) also thinks anxiety can be motivational.
Arousal can be enhanced by anxiety and therefore heightens the
degrees of sensitivity and imagination. In other words, a small
amount of anxiety is not only normal but also it is helpful and
necessary to perform tasks more efficiently. Hamann and Sobaje
(1983) showed that levels of 'state' anxiety could actually assist a
performance. Clearly this correlates with research (Steptoe 1989 and
Hallam 1998) and the Yerkes-Dodson law (Eysenck 1998) as mentioned
before.
Hamann (1982) also managed to
demonstrate a relationship between trait and state anxiety:
performers with high trait anxiety experienced greater increases in
state anxiety than those with lower trait anxiety. Moreover, Hamann
found that students who had a high level of mastery on their
instrument benefited more from the high levels of state anxiety then
those who shared the same levels of trait anxiety but possessed low
mastery. This confirms Zajonc's research (as cited in Lloyd & Mayes
1999) mentioned previously, but clearly there is still opportunity
for more research.
So, the causes of anxiety can be
many different things and the factors that may contribute to
performance anxiety are many: too much practice, too little practice
(Reactive anxiety) fear of illness, other people's expectations, the
pursuit of technical perfection, performing ('state' and
pathological anxiety) and a predisposed tendency to anxiety. (Trait
anxiety and maladaptive anxiety) Identifying the cause of your
anxiety is important and identifying which group your symptoms come
from is significant in deciding which 'therapy' to pursue. Anxiety
is an intrinsic part of human nature and a lot of research has been
focused on how to harness stress and turn it into a positive force.
If you learn why something happens, it usually becomes less
frightening, (Jones 2000) but unfortunately tension plays a
disproportionate part of everyday life for many performing artists
and they have to find a way to cope. |