Analytical Comparison with Other Year Three Silver Shekels

 

Because our shekel seems so unusual, we may find it useful to compare it to other shekels from Year Three. In particular, we should consider whether other coins can be found that have been stamped with the same dies, both obverse and reverse. This would provide additional evidence for the shekel's authenticity. If one cannot find such a match, this could lend support to the assumption that it is fraudulent in origin, or, at the very least, indicate that this artifact is indeed unique among existing Year Three shekels.

 

Of particular facility for making such comparisons is the "Menorah Coin Project," a website devoted to the collection of numerous coins and their classification according to the dies with which they were stamped. Relying on their image data, one may easily identify die used to stamp the obverse of our coin. The first die listed on the webpage could be easily recognized as the one corresponding to the shekel in the USC collection. The page specifically mentions two defects, the raised metal portion between the shin and the chalice and the defect to the left of the resh.

Defect from USC's shekel

Photo Courtesy of Dr. Bruce Zuckerman

Dark metal spot to the left of the shin, USC's coin

Photo Courtesy of Dr. Bruce Zuckerman

Relief next to resh

Defect below shin

http://www.menorahcoinproject.org/h662.htm  

 

 

 

Several pictures of coins struck with the same die are displayed below.

  http://www.menorahcoinproject.org/h662.htm    

 

 

REVERSE COMPARISON

BACK TO PHOTO ANLYSIS

 

 

 

The University of Southern California does not screen or control the content on this website and thus does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, or quality of such content. All content on this website is provided by and is the sole responsibility of the person from which such content originated, and such content does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the University administration or the Board of Trustees